00:00
00:00
FightingSeraph
I've been on here for over a decade and have a high level, so fucking what? Regarding my MSN and Trillian accounts: Request to be added.

Shane @FightingSeraph

Age 39, Male

Need a new one.

N/A

Slidell, Louisiana

Joined on 5/25/01

Level:
60
Exp Points:
41,423 / 100,000
Exp Rank:
220
Vote Power:
10.00 votes
Rank:
Town Watch
Global Rank:
58,535
Blams:
0
Saves:
132
B/P Bonus:
2%
Whistle:
Normal
Medals:
304

Bobby Jindal is no saint/savior, and the same goes for Al Gore, Jr.

Posted by FightingSeraph - October 25th, 2007


Today, I'm going to tear apart two politicians who are portrayed as "heroes" and "do-gooders" by their supporters/defenders. One is a conservative Republican, the other a statist Democrat who helped the Clintons as their VP. It's time for me to take them down and out.

1. Bobby Jindal: The idea that this man is a friend of Louisiana is not what he is about. He voted against tax relief for Katrina and Rita victims and suceeded (David Vitter has also voted this way). He says it's not ok for women to have abortions, but it's acceptable to send 3,000 soldiers to their deaths and 24,000 to the infirmiry. He prattles about what's on tv/in the CD player/at the theater like a dumbass, but he probably watches hardcore porno on his PC when his wife and family aren't home. He ignores any scientific facts that contradict his beliefs (just like the left-wing dipshits that he opposes). Theremore, this man fits the description of self-righteous asshole. Hell, he probably used taxpayer money to get himself elected three times. Of course, there are more things I don't know about him that may or may not be true. However, that looks like something for Michael Parenti to take on sometime.

2. Al Gore: I first decided to go after him in 2004 and I still do at the present. This man claims to be for the enviroment when he uses more power than Ruddock, LA, has a private jet, and drives a car that uses a battery that resulted from strip-mining. Furthermore, he failed three colleges and didn't do very well in science. This man spews out self-righteous shit about things that he has no clue. Not to mention he goes after social liberty for fear that it might lead to free thought. After all, free thought is what James Randi, John Stossel, myself, and P&T truly champion. My "interview" with this sack of shit will end rather grim.


Comments

Comments ain't a thing here.